Відео

For this assembly you will need 2 - 17mm Socket Wrench and/or 17mm open/adjustable wrench.

Each arm can hold 125lbs. so it has a max weight capacity of 250lbs. For more info check out the product on our website: valorfitness.com/products/bf-47-adjustable-flat-incline-bench-press

The short bars are being used more in functional fitness competitions and can be helpful as a training tool if you don't have a lot of space.

@@ValorFitnessIncwhat a waste you’re paying more to be able to put less plates on?

Right,looked like one guy did all that.

well that’s just not true, but it’s not the ones they’re trying to hit and DEFINITELY 0 pull-ups were completed during the entire thing.

We did a stress test on this & of it being used in a competition, links below. The bench itself held up no problem with almost 3000lbs on it. The squat stands held 2000lbs just fine. ua-cam.com/users/shorts6UPlDrgw9gg ua-cam.com/users/shortsRazIxM60vu4

@@ValorFitnessInc Prefect!! Thank you, this helped!

Did you find out? I’m trying to find out to

They have 0 reviews for this machine

@@thomaspham-qf4rylmk as well

​@thomaspham-qf4ry take reviews with a grain of salt. The company has control on what gets posted. I've left 2 3 star reviews on titans website and both were removed. If you watch the video, the strength curve appears decent for extension. Not as good for flexion, as the plate looks like it's at 90 degrees and it's heaviest at end range. CS response is good. I'm told it's 11G steel which is questionable given the weight of the machine. Also told they are bearings not bushings which is good. I am still on the fence. I have selectorized units so in no rush. Will post a review here if I decide to buy.

@@fuhgedabowtit for sure keep me posted

The angle is approximately 45 degrees.

No it wouldn't. Isolateral is 10x better, makes sure both legs are working the same load. Also will increase core and joint stability. They make a much cheaper bilateral version if that's your cup.of tea.

@@fuhgedabowtit Respectfully, that's an opinion I disagree with, and in any case the simple option of using the machine both ways would make it more versatile.

​@MrChristopherMolloy Versatile I would agree with. But as someone who played sports age 6-20, weightlifting 14-46(present) and working as a physical therapist x23 years I can confidently tell you iso is better. The majority of ppl, athletes included, have a unilateral strength deficit which places them as risk for injury when performing closed chain bilateral activities. If I had the choice of EITHER iso or regular, it would be iso for every gym machine. The only pro I see doing bilateral open chain exercises is for time management or a specific movement for sports, but 9 times out of 10, those mvmts will be closed chain anyway.

@@fuhgedabowtit Since most people aren't athletes and time management is a very real thing, especially as it relates to exercise adherence, the bilateral vs isoilateral thing is n important thing to consider when designing both a gym and a program. That being said, some might suggest a solution might be to perform an exercise like this isolateral knee extension in unison, with.both right and left legs working at the same time, but since limbs rarely have (more likely never have) parity in terms of strength, the moment of failure (which should be the objective of an exercise like this) will be different for each limb, making the process of failing both clumsy and potentially dangerous. Also, there is nothing which prevents a fused or single movement arm design from being used on the rare occasion where isolateral exercise may be necessary or desired, so there's that too. This knee extension machine is basically a copy of an earlier Hammer Strength design (and marketing scheme) which put them on the map 30 years ago, but their earliest leg extension model was not isolateral, it was a single movement arm design(borrowed from Nautilus) being balanced at both ends, which prevented the flexing of the movent arm and uneven torquing which occurs with machines with a single movement arm balanced by a single side. So a single movement arm balanced from both sides is the superior design IMHO ✌️

@@fuhgedabowtit Can a traditional single movement arm Leg Extension machine be used to perform single limb exercise? The answer is obviously yes, so there are very few benefits to designing a more complicated & expensive machine for the rare occasion when iso-lateral exercise of a limb or compound muscle -joint function is necessary or desired. The reason I mentioned a coupling option, is that movement arms supported by a single side, like most Leg Extensions, have the tendency to flex, thus creating an imbalance of applied force on the limb furthest away from where the movement arm is affixed. This can be remedied by either supporting the movement arm centrally as was done in early Nautilus designs, or by supporting the movement arm at either end as in the non iso-lateral Hammer Strength Leg Extension (borrowed from the Nautilus Leverage design) and the MedX Medical Knee design. Lastly, time efficiency should be a consideration when designing a gym (home or otherwise) and exercise program, particularly when it comes to plate-loaded machines.

Probably, but it would still bend.

You can check out all our products @ Valorfitness.com this is our competition bench - squat stand combo rack (BE-15)

It was a BLAST! 😂